《永生的海拉》劇情介紹
《永生的海拉》是由喬治·烏爾夫執導，麗貝卡·斯凱特,彼得·蘭德斯曼,亞歷山大·伍,喬治·烏爾夫編劇，奧普拉·溫弗瑞,羅絲·伯恩,芮妮·戈等明星主演的劇情,電影。
《永生的海拉》是根據RebeccaSkloot的暢銷(xiāo)書(shū)《海拉·拉克斯的不朽人生》改編而成的電影。故事主要講述了海拉·拉克斯的細胞被用于醫學(xué)研究的背后故事，以及她的女兒黛博拉·拉克斯與一位年輕女記者麗貝卡·斯克魯特之間的友誼。海拉·拉克斯是一位黑人女性，她在1951年因癌癥去世，但她的細胞卻被醫學(xué)研究者非法獲取并用于研究。這些細胞被稱(chēng)為“海拉細胞”或“不死細胞”，因為它們在培養皿中能夠不斷分裂和生長(cháng)，而且對各種疾病的研究有著(zhù)巨大的貢獻。然而，海拉的家人對于她的細胞被使用并獲得商業(yè)利益一無(wú)所知。黛博拉·拉克斯是海拉的女兒，她一直試圖了解自己母親的故事，并尋找真相。她與麗貝卡·斯克魯特建立了親密的友誼，共同展開(kāi)了一段冒險的旅程，追尋海拉細胞的歷史和影響。這部電影通過(guò)真實(shí)的故事，揭示了醫學(xué)界的倫理問(wèn)題和種族歧視，并探討了人性中的善良和勇氣。它也展示了黛博拉和麗貝卡之間跨越種族和社會(huì )差異的友誼，以及他們共同尋找真相的決心和努力?！队郎暮＠肥且徊考雀腥擞忠松钏嫉碾娪?，它讓觀(guān)眾反思醫學(xué)倫理和社會(huì )正義的重要性，同時(shí)也展示了人類(lèi)堅強不屈的意志和希望。
《永生的海拉》別名：海瑞塔·拉克斯的不朽人生 海拉細胞的不死傳奇(港臺)，于2017-04-22上映，制片國家/地區為美國。時(shí)長(cháng)共93分鐘，總集數1集，語(yǔ)言對白英語(yǔ)，最新?tīng)顟B(tài)HD。該電影評分6.7分，評分人數503人。
《永生的海拉》演員表
《永生的海拉》評論
同類(lèi)型電影
- 更新HD
夏日風(fēng)暴
羅伯特·施塔德洛伯,科斯蒂亞·烏爾曼,艾麗卡·巴赫蕾達-庫魯斯,Jürgen Tonkel
《永生的海拉》影評
公平？?。?！
《永生的海拉》是根據RebeccaSkloot的紀實(shí)文學(xué)改編的電影，講述了海拉·拉克斯的故事。海拉·拉克斯是一位上世紀五十年代身患癌癥的黑人女性，她的癌細胞被非法獲取并被用于醫學(xué)研究。這些細胞被稱(chēng)為“不死的”細胞，對醫學(xué)界有重大影響。電影主要圍繞海拉·拉克斯的女兒黛博拉展開(kāi)，她試圖理解自己從未見(jiàn)過(guò)的母親，并研究她與現代醫學(xué)發(fā)展之間的關(guān)聯(lián)。電影深入揭示了醫學(xué)界存在的問(wèn)題，并探討了友誼和人類(lèi)情感的力量。這部電影不僅帶來(lái)了懸疑和傳記的刺激，還讓觀(guān)眾思考醫學(xué)界的倫理和道德問(wèn)題。
這篇影評可能有劇透
I have to say that I was not moved at all. They seem to care about only money and kept going after financial compensations, not justice. Any family without a mother will have problems around it, no matter how the mother died or whether she turned into an immortal cell line or not. So save the pity. I wish the movie could educate more on the medical regulations back then and today. The movie did not detail on the drug tests they did on their mother or sister and should have spent more time on it instead of having Oprah showing off her ability of playing hysteric. These people have very little basic biology/medical knowledge and it can be extremely hard to teach them and make sure they stay objective about science and knowledge. They are after the money. They don't understand medicine or science. That's it.If no consent was required from patient back then, they cannot sue Johns Hopkins.
If it's just about donating a little cancer tissue for research, I don't think, even today, the patient gets any specific financial compensation for that. It does not matter what your little biopsy turns out to be in 50 years or longer. I don't see a lot of other unhumane drug tests described in the movie. It's all about Oprah's emotions, not history or science.
Oprah's performance is too dramatic. If the movie is about racism, then make it about racism. And that did not seem to be the center of the movie either.
Johns Hopkins did mis-reported the name of the patient in the first place, and called it Helen Lane. (For quite a while during my research career, I thought it was Helen...) They should do something about it. And I feel sorry about it, too.
When HBO first released the movie, I thought they were going to make a very objective documentary instead of this sh*t. Isn't it true that HBO is good at showing good documentaries? What happened to them wasting money on this...
Just want to be fair from the perspective of a medical researcher. Please don't take anything personally.
